That’s a lot of words for “no” No also actually addresses the question asked, instead of, like, desperately sidestepping like one is allergic or something
What you are trying to say, blue—method, and what you DID say are to completely different things. You can try and turn it on “da haterz” and say we aren’t open minded enough or logical enough to understand you, you edgy teenager you.
But here is the thing: You’re right to a degree. Rape will happen. Murder will happen. Thieft will happen. The world ks a terrible terrible place. But to use an analogy: there is a reason that we put locks on our doors. Not to outsmart a criminal, but to prevent a crime from happening.
What you are doing is sidestepping and victim blaming: “It’s the person’s fault for not locking down their house with metal shutters!”
Instead of: “The criminal broke the lock!”
Most women you speak of, the ones who get drunk, DO take measures to prevent rape - but this does not always stop a rapist. The criminal broke the lock.
Sure, you can get coerced and pressured into sick, which is still rape. The criminal coerced you into unlocking your house.
You are a rape apologist and here is exactly why: it’s the victims fault for not locking up as securely as I did.
I think the one who is closed minded and illogical is you if you can’t see that you are victim blaming women who want to have a good time. I understand you are terrified of getting rape, but that doesn’t give you the right to tell people to OUTSMART the criminal and if you get raped you clearly aren’t smart enough.
That is exactly what you alluded too. It’s never the victims fault. The criminal broke the lock.
Ummm, maybe if you paid fucking attention you’d see I’ve been saying THERE ARE WAYS OF AVOIDING RAPE. You are twisting my fucking words. Just fucking stop.